Posts tagged ‘Hong Kong’

20/05/2013

* Luxury is out; bargains are in for Chinese tourists

SCMP: “Armed with empty suitcases and same-day return tickets, an army of mainland Chinese is descending on suburban outlet shopping malls and international fashion chains in Hong Kong, turning cheap into the new chic as luxury falls out of favour.

_hkg02_35878285.jpg

Wealthy Chinese used to stop over in Hong Kong for a few days to pick up a Louis Vuitton bag or a wristwatch for up to 40 per cent less than in Beijing or Shanghai.

These well-heeled tourists have now been overtaken by bargain-hunters that stay for a few hours, spend more at shops like Inditex’s Zara and malls such as Citygate Outlets, turning Hong Kong into a must-be location for retailers who are braving some of the world’s most expensive commercial rents.

“There are more mainland consumers than locals,” said Tsz Chung, a salesman at a Nike store in Citygate, located in the satellite town of Tung Chung near the airport. “Typically, mainland consumers look for cheap goods.”

Foreign retailers treat Hong Kong as a gateway to China, which is poised to become the world’s biggest consumer market in three years, and how mainland tourists shop is big business. Sluggish sales growth in Europe and the United States also makes China, with its rapidly expanding middle class and rising incomes, especially attractive.

Chinese nationals were the largest single group of tourists to Hong Kong last year. Of the 35 million who visited, 20 million came and left the same day, an increase of more than a third on 2011, according to tourism bureau data.

Many short-term visitors come by shuttle bus or train from the southern Chinese province of Guangdong. They often head straight to Citygate, where more than 80 international brands including Levi’s jeans, Coach, Polo Ralph Lauren and Burberry are offered at steep discounts.

“It’s cheaper here and there’s a wide range of options,” said Chen Yunlong, a 29-year-old tourist from the border town of Shenzhen as he strolled through the mall on a recent Saturday.

Visitors like Chen, who said he shops in Hong Kong up to three times a week, made Citygate the best performer among the big malls operated by realtor Swire Properties.

First-quarter sales rose 22 per cent at the outlet mall, beating a one per cent loss at the luxury-focused Pacific Place and a 3.5 per cent increase at the mid-tier Cityplaza mall.

At the Nike outlet, Chung said all sales staff were now required to be fluent in Mandarin, the most prevalent Chinese dialect. Most Hong Kong residents speak Cantonese.

Thrifty Chinese tourists are also proving a boon for New Town Plaza, a shopping mall located in the suburban Sha Tin district and owned by Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.

Retail rents at New Town, which is miles away from spots frequented by tourists, are among the city’s highest. Last month, L Brands lingerie chain Victoria’s Secrets chose to locate its first Hong Kong stores at the mall and the prime downtown district of Central.

The increase in the number of bargain-seeking Chinese tourists was a factor that attracted 51 international brands to set up their first Asia Pacific stores in Hong Kong last year, about twice as many as in Singapore and Tokyo, according to research recently released by property consultancy CBRE.

Affordable retailers already established in the region are also forking out lofty rentals to attract these visitors.

Japan’s Fast Retailing, owner of the Uniqlo clothing chain, last month opened a 37,500-square-foot store in the iconic Causeway Bay, which overtook New York’s Fifth Avenue as the world’s most expensive retail location.

British fashion brand Topshop will open a 14,000 sq ft store in Central in June, paying $516,000 a month in rent. Zara is also taking over the space once occupied by H&M.

“There are just too many brands looking for shops,” said Susan MacLennan, director of retail at property consultants Savills in land-scarce, densely populated Hong Kong. “A lot of international brands are still very interested, but it’s quite difficult to find space for them.”

The boom in Hong Kong’s mass market retail sector comes as luxury goods sales suffer due to a slowdown in China’s economic growth, a government crackdown on giving expensive gifts in return for favours and in-your-face displays of wealth.

LVMH, the world’s biggest luxury goods group, said in April demand in China had been “flattish” for about 10 months. Luxury watch retailers Sincere Watch (Hong Kong) and Emperor Watch & Jewellery also reported a decline in sales.

In a bid to boost business, some upmarket brands are sending clients on all-inclusive shopping trips to Hong Kong.

But as the influence of these big-spenders on the global luxury market wanes, the spending power of their less wealthy countrymen is rising and changing Hong Kong’s retail scene.”

via Luxury is out; bargains are in for Chinese tourists | South China Morning Post.

About these ads
11/04/2013

* British shops ration baby milk as Chinese demand surges

Reuters: “British shops are rationing sales of baby milk after Chinese visitors and bulk buyers cleared their shelves to send it to China, where many parents fear the local versions are dangerous.

Shoppers browse the aisles in the Canary Wharf store of Waitrose in London January 23, 2013. REUTERS/Neil Hall

The British Retail Consortium (BRC), whose members account for 80 percent of the sector, said many stores had imposed a two-box limit on each customer to deter the “unofficial exports” to China.

Demand for foreign milk powder has been high in China since at least six infants died and 300,000 fell ill in 2008 after they drank milk laced with the industrial chemical melamine.

The scandal sapped consumer confidence in Chinese-made food and led to shortages of powdered milk in Hong Kong and Australia as people bought boxes to export to China.

The rise of the middle-class Chinese working mother has greatly increased sales of baby milk in the world’s most populous country. Fast-growing markets like China support a global baby food market worth an estimated $30 billion a year.”

via British shops ration baby milk as Chinese demand surges | Reuters.

11/03/2013

* Yuan Flows a More Freely as China Relaxes Controls

WSJ: “The use of China’s yuan abroad is rising as Beijing slowly loosens its grip and allows a wider group of investors to buy the nation’s currency, stocks and bonds.

The offshore yuan in Hong Kong, where the currency is freely traded, is near the highest in a month partly because investors are taking advantage of a slight relaxation in rules on its capital markets. Last week, Beijing allowed Hong Kong units of Chinese banks and insurers, as well as Hong Kong-registered financial institutions, to invest in China’s stocks and bonds for the first time with yuan raised offshore.”

via Yuan Flows a More Freely as China Relaxes Controls – WSJ.com.

10/03/2013

* From Auspicious Forest to Happy Establishment: A Literally Translated Map of China

The Atlantic: “One of the pleasures of studying the Chinese language is realizing that a huge number of words actually consist of combinations of smaller words.

shanghaiistchinamap.jpg

For example, the word for camera, zhaoxiangji, literally translates as something like “mutual flash machine”. Which, if you think about it, makes sense but…yeah. Never mind.

Along these lines, this nifty map of unknown origin, but pulled from the Shanghaiist Facebook feed shows China with the names of its provinces and nearby countries translated literally into English. Most of them are kind of meh, but  a few amusing ones stick out: Liaoning Province is called, quite ominously for a province bordering North Korea, “distant peace”. North Korea itself is referred to as “Morning Calm”, which, given the country’s recent behavior, doesn’t seem to fit at all. Far-western, bone-dry Qinghai Province translates into “Blue Sea”, which would be fine except that its thousands of miles from the coast. Guizhou, one of China’s poorest provinces, is nonetheless referred to as “Expensive State”.

Then there’s Russia which, oddly, translates to “Land of Rowers”, conjuring up an image of a fur coat wearing crew team spiriting down the Volga.Though it isn’t on this map, its often remarked that the Chinese word for the United States, meiguo, translates to “beautiful country”. Alas, this has less to do with an appreciation of the American landscape than the fact that meiguo sounds vaguely similar to America. All this goes to show how little the literal meanings of place names even matter. For example, what does the name “Hong Kong” evoke? For me, its tall buildings, finance, British customs, kung fu movies, and great dim sum. Fragrant harbor? Not quite. But that’s exactly what Hong Kong means.

via From Auspicious Forest to Happy Establishment: A Literally Translated Map of China – Matt Schiavenza – The Atlantic.

01/03/2013

* China’s billionaires on rise

China Daily: “China has had more billionaires created by its stock markets this year than in the United States - 212 compared with 211 - a new survey revealed on Thursday.

China's Rich List – The Inside Story

According to the latest Hurun Global Rich List 2013, there were 1,453 people in the world with personal wealth of $1 billion or more at the end of January.

Another significant sign of more wealth being created in the East came with figures showing Asia was home to the highest number of billionaires, with 608, followed by 440 from North America and 324 from Europe, said Hurun researchers.

Among individual countries, the US and the Greater China area dominated with 408 and 357 respectively, followed by Russia, Germany and India.

Between them, the US and China now have half of all billionaires on the planet.

Moscow, with 76 billionaires, is the billionaire capital of the world, followed by New York, Hong Kong, Beijing and London, according to the report.

Mexican telecom czar Carlos Slim, 73, was ranked as the “Richest Man on the Planet” with a personal fortune of $66 billion, followed by US investor Warren Buffett with $58 billion in wealth.

Founder of fashion brand Zara, Amancio Ortega of Spain, shoots into the top three with $55 billion in wealth.

Real estate, telecommunications, media, technology and retail were the most common sources of wealth, the report added.”

via China’s billionaires on rise |Economy |chinadaily.com.cn.

01/03/2013

* Hurun rich list stirs Chinese zodiac discussion

English: The carvings with Chinese Zodiac on t...

English: The carvings with Chinese Zodiac on the ceiling of the gate to Kushida Shrine in Fukuoka ) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

SCMP: “The publication of the Hurun Global Rich List 2013, which revealed the top 10 wealthiest Chinese billionaires, on Thursday has triggered discussion among Chinese netizens about the Chinese zodiac signs of the rich.

 

The dragon is the most common zodiac sign among the billionaires, followed by the horse, said a post by China’s Global Times.

Commenting on the list of billionaires, one netizen wrote, “Chinese officials must be laughing at this so-called ‘rich list’.”

Others chimed in with comments on Chinese zodiac signs. “Dragons are born with a kind of self-confidence. They are destined to play a strong role,” one said.

Another claimed, “I will give birth to a ‘dragon baby’ and a ‘horse baby’!”

A third wrote, “Global Times, mind your own business.”

The report, compiled by the Shanghai-based Hurun Research Institute, showed that Hong Kong entrepreneurs make up the majority of the list, followed by those from Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen.

The top industry sector favoured by the Chinese billionaires on the list is real estate, followed by manufacturing, finance and investment, and information technology.”

via Hurun rich list stirs Chinese zodiac discussion | South China Morning Post.

14/02/2013

* Claims China is world’s No 1 trading economy are nonsense

SCMP: “The high import and export numbers are distorted by domestic firms fiddling taxes and the country’s heavy involvement in processing trade

scm_biz_tom_holland_14-02.art_2.jpg

Mainland imports of goods from the mainland via Hong Kong (left) and foreign value-added content of China’s exports

If you believe the media reports, China passed another milestone last year, overtaking the United States to become the world’s biggest trading economy.

According to data from Beijing’s customs officers, China’s total imports and exports of goods reached US$3.87 trillion in 2012.

In contrast, figures from the US Commerce Department show that America’s international goods trade was worth just US$3.82 trillion.

Hooray! China beats the US by US$50 billion.

Except there’s a problem: the figures are nonsense.

The most obvious way they are wrong is because China’s import and export numbers are heavily distorted by domestic companies fiddling their taxes.

Under mainland regulations, exporters of electronic gadgets and other widgetry can claim a value-added tax rebate worth 17 per cent of the goods’ value.

What’s more, under the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement, no tariffs are charged on goods imported into the mainland from Hong Kong, provided the importer claims a relatively small component of value was added in the city.

As a result, mainland companies ship huge quantities of goods to Hong Kong, where their value is marked up by around 20 per cent before they are re-imported back into the mainland.

With this dodge, the scammers not only get their tax rebate when they export. By over-invoicing the re-imports, they get to circumvent the mainland’s capital controls and ship money offshore, either to invest in international markets (or Hong Kong’s properties) or to round-trip back into the mainland as foreign direct investment, which qualifies them for yet more tax breaks.

Figures from the Hong Kong government show the city was responsible for re-exporting some US$116 billion worth of stuff from the mainland back to the mainland last year, a 13 per cent increase over the year before (see the first chart).

If we assume the mainland importers claimed that 17 per cent of the value of their purchases was added in Hong Kong, which is in line with the Trade Development Council’s figures, then we can estimate that the value of the mainland’s total goods trade – both exports and imports – last year was exaggerated by some US$212 billion.

As a result, it looks very much as if China still lags some US$160 billion behind the US in terms of its international trade in goods, with just US$3.66 trillion of combined imports and exports in 2012, compared with America’s US$3.82 trillion.

But even those figures are dubious. That’s because much of China’s international commerce consists of processing trade. High-value components from developed economies get imported, bolted together by low-paid workers in China’s factories, and then re-exported to their final markets.

As a result, China’s contribution to the total value of the goods it exports is low by international standards.

Infamously, one 2011 study estimated that China’s share of the value added in a made-in-Shenzhen iPad with a US retail price of US$499 was just US$8.

Overall, according to the trade in value added database compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the foreign value-added share of China’s exports amounted to 26 per cent of their face value in 2009. For US exports, the proportion was 11 per cent.

That makes a huge difference to the raw trade numbers. In 2009, the foreign value-added content of China’s exports was worth almost US$400 billion, compared with US$160 billion for US exports (see the second chart).

Adjust the gross trade numbers to allow for this difference, and it soon becomes apparent that China is still a long way from becoming the world’s largest trading economy in any meaningful sense, despite what last week’s headlines may have claimed.”

via Claims China is world’s No 1 trading economy are nonsense | South China Morning Post.

 

See also: http://chindia-alert.org/2013/02/12/6166/

03/02/2013

* Number one rule of Royalty, ladies – no spitting! The woman set to cure China of its bad manners by importing a touch of British class

Mail on Sunday: “The woman who wants to cure China of its bad manners by importing a touch of British class

Elegance, to a tea: Sara Jane Ho charges thousands to teach manners to Beijing women

It is still acceptable behaviour in China to spit on the street, blow your nose in your hand, slurp your soup and unashamedly push ahead in a queue.

Hong Kong born Sara Jane Ho was brought up in London and has imported British manners to Beijing with her school of etiquette. Ms Ho charges up to £10,000 to improve manners in China’s high society.

They buy more Bentleys than the British, fill their luxury homes with more Swarovski crystal than the Swiss, and spend more on Louis Vuitton and Versace than the French or the Italians. But one precious commodity has eluded the Chinese in their extraordinary rise from peasant nation to superpower: good manners.

Officials are so exasperated by the tendency to spit, shout, slurp and push in at queues that they have taken to pleading and cajoling. It is not long since Shanghai launched a ‘Seven Nos’ campaign: no spitting, no littering, no vandalism, no damaging greenery, no jaywalking, no smoking in public places and no swearing. It was a  dismal failure.

During the 2008 Beijing Olympics, a squad of 1,500 supervisors was sent out to discourage fighting at bus stops. Paper bags were handed out by volunteers in uniforms emblazoned with the Chinese characters for mucus.

But when a Beijing university set  up a ‘civic index’ to calculate the level of politeness, researchers concluded glumly that the city was still a long way off international norms and the index was quietly dropped.

Now, however, a school of etiquette is about to open in Beijing with classes based on the deportment of the British aristocracy – and the decorous behaviour of the Duchess of Cambridge.

Sara Jane Ho, a Hong Kong businesswoman who grew up in London, is offering lessons in being classy to an exclusive clientele for an appropriately princely sum: courses at her Institute Sarita, based in the five-star Park Hyatt Hotel in Beijing, cost from £2,000 to £10,000.

Dozens of society wives have signed up for lectures on how to use a knife and fork properly, how to peel a piece of fruit, how to greet a prospective mother-in-law, how to walk in heels and how to eat soup without slurping. High-powered bosses of Chinese state-owned companies are also hiring Sara Jane for lessons on how to conduct themselves at business meetings in Europe and America.

She says a subtle pro-British snobbery is driving the desire of wealthy Chinese to improve themselves socially: ‘There is an aura of mystery about European royalty that Chinese people can’t resist. Any aristocracy in China was wiped out, so the Chinese are fascinated by the idea of a royal dynasty that stretches back hundreds of years.’

via Number one rule of Royalty, ladies – no spitting! The woman set to cure China of its bad manners by importing a touch of British class | Mail Online.

23/01/2013

* Middle-class Chinese snap up overseas luxury

China Daily: “An increasing number of middle-class Chinese are buying luxury goods outside the Chinese mainland, with more overseas travel driving the trend, a KPMG report said on Tuesday.

Seventy-one percent of survey respondents ― middle-class mainland residents ― traveled overseas in 2012, compared with 53 percent in 2008. And 72 percent of them said they bought luxury items during such trips, with cosmetics, watches and handbags being the most popular items.

Brand recognition continues to rise as consumers become more discerning and seek experiential luxury as well as one-of-a-kind luxury brands and products. Respondents said they recognize 59 luxury brands, from 45 in survey conducted in 2010.

The report ― The Global Reach of China Luxury ― is based on a survey of 1,200 middle-class Chinese consumers in 24 cities. Market research firm TNS conducted the study.

Respondents were 20 to 44 years old, with a minimum household income of 7,500 yuan ($1,205) a month in tier-one cities and 5,500 yuan elsewhere.

Chinese consumers associate certain countries with particular products. For example, Switzerland is recognized for its luxury watches, while France scores highest for cosmetics and perfumes.”

via Middle-class Chinese snap up overseas luxury[1]|chinadaily.com.cn.

See also: http://unintend-conseq.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/corruption-curbs-crimp-luxury-market.html

22/01/2013

* Chinese student in France sick of buying luxury goods for other people

SCMP: “Li Yuandong, 23, remembers buying 10 Burberry scarfs, two Burberry handbags, two Louis Vuitton handbags and some luxury perfumes in one day in Paris without blinking an eye.

px096_3238_7.jpg

“Then I blew my ‘millionaire’ identity by hopping on a crowded subway train heading home”, wrote Li, a Chinese graduate student studying engineering in France on his blog.

Li’s post went viral on China’s social media, including Sina Weibo, China’s popular twitter-like service.

In a humorous tone, Li wrote about his side job of buying luxury goods for friends in China, and complained the burden was growing too heavy.

“I became so popular after moving to France,” said Li in his post. “Suddenly everyone wanted to talk to me.”

But the conversations all ended with the same question: “Can you buy me a Louis Vuitton”?

“My bank upgraded me to VIP after seeing the amount of money sent by friends in China,“ he said, “I would easily spend 10,000 euros in a month on hand bags.””

via Chinese student in France sick of buying luxury goods for other people | South China Morning Post.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 156 other followers