Archive for ‘Hindu temples’

19/03/2020

Coronavirus: Indian cities go eerily quiet as cases rise

A youth (C) wearing a facemask as a preventive measure against the COVID-19 coronavirus plays cricket with his friends at a park in New Delhi on March 18, 2020.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES
Image caption Small groups of young people can be seen playing sports as schools, colleges and even gyms are shut.

Life in India has changed dramatically as the world’s second-most populous country grapples with the coronavirus outbreak.

Otherwise crowded and chaotic cities have quietened down as people stay home, traffic slows and even weddings shrink in size and scale.

India has confirmed 151 active cases and three deaths – but public health experts fear that the low count is the result of limited testing and under-reporting. The country has only conducted about 12,000 tests so far, partly because of a shortage of testing kits.

So it’s still unclear if and to what extent community transmission exists in India – community transmission means a patient had no known contact with another confirmed case or travelled from a country badly affected by the pandemic.

However, India’s central government, several state governments and city administrations have already responded with drastic measures.

Low footfall seen at Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport amid rising coronavirus fear on March 16, 2020 in New Delhi, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

The Indira Gandhi international airport in the national capital Delhi, is the country’s busiest airport but it appears deserted nowadays.

India has barred entry to everyone, including citizens, flying from certain countries, including the UK and most European nations. It has also cancelled most entry visas to people (excluding citizens) flying in from other countries.

This has led to numerous flight cancellations.

Airlines are also struggling as fewer people are flying even within India, wary that new regulations could see them stranded away from their homes. Two of India’s top airlines are reportedly considering grounding planes amid plummeting demand for flights.

An Indian tourist disappointed to see the Red Fort, closed for tourists to prevent spread of Covid-19, as she look towards the ford on March 17, 2020 in New Delhi, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Popular Indian monuments – such as the 16th Century Red Fort in Delhi – have been shut to visitors to prevent large gatherings.

Taj Mahal, the country’s most iconic monument, closed its doors on Tuesday, along with more than 140 other monuments and museums.

With fewer people visiting and closures of public places likely to go up, tourism is expected to take a huge hit across India – the Taj alone draws as many as 70,000 people a day.

A security personnel stands guard in front of a closed shopping mall amid concerns over the spread of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus, in Bangalore on March 16, 2020.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Bangalore, an IT hub in southern India, is among the major cities that has shut down its malls – such as the one above – and schools, colleges, cinema halls and other public places have been closed since late last week. Other major cities such as Delhi, the financial hub Mumbai and Hyderabad in the south, have done the same.

City officials have also imposed restrictions on large gatherings such as weddings, cricket matches or any public ticketed events.

A bird feed vendor wearing a facemask as a preventive measure against the COVID-19 coronavirus waits for customers at a market area in New Delhi on March 19, 2020Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Some of Delhi’s busiest spots, such as Connaught Place, are mostly empty.

There has also been a significant drop in the number of people using trains, which remain the most popular form of transport in India.

Around 25% to 30% drop of passenger traveling from Mumbai to Pune in Deccan Queen was observed after coronavirus outbreak, at CSMT, on March 16, 2020 in Mumbai, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

The service from Mumbai to Pune city – which takes about three to four hours – has seen about a 30% fall in passenger traffic, according to some estimates.

The western state of Maharashtra, where both cities are located, has reported the highest number of cases in India so far. The central railways has already cancelled 23 long distance trains going to and from Mumbai – officials say the reason is both the virus and the lower number of passengers.

Overall, more than 150 trains have been cancelled across India. This number could increase in coming days.

Low footfall of devotees seen at Golden Temple due to the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) on March 17, 2020 in Amritsar, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Many holy sites, including the Golden Temple – one of the holiest shrines in Sikhism – remain open, although the footfall is much lower. It’s quite unusual to see such few people in what is one of India’s busiest shrines.

Tirumala Tirupati, the richest Hindu temple, has cancelled many of its daily rituals and is restricting the number of pilgrims for the first time.

Some major Hindu temples, such as the Siddhivinayak temple in the heart of Mumbai, and the Vaishno Devi cave shrine, have closed.

DTC cleaning staff chemically disinfect and sanitize auto rickshaw as a precautionary measure in view of coronavirus concerns, at Vasant Vihar Depot on March 17, 2020 in New Delhi, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

City officials in Delhi have begun sanitising auto rickshaws and taxis to contain the spread of the virus.

Public transport poses a major challenge to containing the outbreak. But it continues to be used regularly across India, even as governments encourage people to stay home as much as possible.

But not all offices have work from home options, and this is especially a challenge for the millions who work in India’s informal sector – these include domestic help, street vendors and daily wage workers.

Women of Shaheen Bagh continue their sit-in protest against the CAA-NRC-NPR despite the Coronavirus advisory issued by Delhi government, at Shaheen Bagh on March 17, 2020 in New Delhi, India.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Surprisingly, sit-in protests against India’s controversial new citizenship law continue in some cities, including Delhi and Bangalore.

The most prominent of these, pictured above, is happening in Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh neighbourhood. Thousands of protesters, mostly Muslim women, have been demonstrating against the law, which critics say is anti-Muslim, since December.

But Delhi has shut down schools, colleges, gyms, night clubs, spas and swimming pools – and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has said all social, political and religious gatherings with more than 50 people would be stopped.

Doctor of West Bengal Health Government Department conduct thermal screening as prevention from coronavirus (COVID-19) infection at Kolkata High Court in Kolkata, India on Tuesday, March 17, 2020.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

Temperature checks have become a common feature across cities – here, people are being screened before they enter the high court in the eastern city of Kolkata (formerly Calcutta).

This practice has been adopted at airports, corporate offices and several other places that remain open despite the restrictions.

A mother ties a facemask on her daughter amid concerns over the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus as she attends the first day of her tenth class examinations in Secunderabad, the twin city of Hyderabad, on March 19, 2020.Image copyright GETTY IMAGES

In the southern city of Hyderabad, students appeared for their school-leaving exams, but they came armed with masks.

Delhi, however, has postponed all school examinations.

Experts say India could impose more sweeping lockdowns as the toll climbs further.

Source: The BBC

14/11/2019

Sabarimala temple: India court to review ruling on women’s entry

Devotees inside the Sabarimala templeImage copyright KAVIYOOR SANTHOSH
Image caption Sabarimala is one of the most prominent Hindu temples in the country

India’s Supreme Court has agreed to review its landmark judgement allowing women of menstruating age to enter a controversial Hindu shrine.

A five-judge bench last year ruled that keeping women out of the Sabarimala shrine in the southern state of Kerala was discriminatory.

The verdict led to massive protests in the state.

Women who tried to enter the shrine were either sent back or, in some cases, even assaulted.

The move is likely to anger women who fought hard to win the right to enter the temple.

Hinduism regards menstruating women as unclean and bars them from participating in religious rituals.

Many temples bar women during their periods and many devout women voluntarily stay away, but Sabarimala had a blanket ban on all women between the ages of 10 and 50.

What did the court say?

On Thursday the five-judge bench, responding to dozens of review petitions challenging the court’s landmark judgement last year, said that the matter would now be heard by a larger bench.

In doing so, however, it did not stay its earlier order. This means women can still legally enter the temple.

But it’s not going to be easy for them.

Two women trying to enter the temple in full riot gear
Image caption Some women tried to enter the temple last year

A temple official welcomed the ruling and appealed to women to stay away.

Women trying to enter the temple after the verdict last year were attacked by mobs blocking the way.

Many checked vehicles heading towards the temple to see if any women of a “menstruating age” – deemed to be those aged between 10 and 50 years – were trying to enter.

Following Thursday’s verdict, police in Kerala have appealed for calm, saying that action will be taken “against those who take the law into their own hands”. They added that social media accounts would be under surveillance and those stoking religious tensions online would be arrested.line

‘One step forward, two steps back’

Geeta Pandey, BBC News, Delhi

Today’s verdict will come as a massive disappointment to women’s rights campaigners. It’s a case of one step forward, two steps back.

In 2018, while lifting the ban on women’s entry into the shrine, the Supreme Court had said that everyone had the right to practice religion and that the ban was a form of “untouchability”.

It was seen as a hugely progressive ruling and had given hope to women that they were equal before the law and could now claim equality before the gods too. What happened in court today has taken that sense away.

The Supreme Court has not put its earlier order on hold, but with the ambiguity over women’s entry continuing, it’s very likely they could be kept out in the name of keeping peace.

With the case now to be reopened by a larger seven-judge bench, the fight will have to be fought all over again.line

Why is the temple so controversial?

Part of the violent opposition to the Supreme Court order to reverse the temple’s historical ban on women was because protesters felt the ruling goes against the wishes of the deity, Lord Ayappa, himself.

While most Hindu temples allow women to enter as long as they are not menstruating, the Sabarimala temple is unusual in that it was one of the few that did not allow women in a broad age group to enter at all.

Hindu devotees say that the ban on women entering Sabarimala is not about menstruation alone – it is also in keeping with the wish of the deity who is believed to have laid down clear rules about the pilgrimage to seek his blessings.

Indian Police patrol during clashes between Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) and Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) in front of the Kerala Government Secretariat in Thiruvnanthapuram on January 02, 2019Image copyright GETTY IMAGES
Image caption The entry of women into the Sabarimala temple sparked angry scenes

Every year, millions of male devotees trek up a steep hill, often barefoot, to visit the shrine. They also undertake a rigorous 41-day fast, abstaining from smoking, alcohol, meat, sex and contact with menstruating women before they begin the journey.

Women’s rights campaigners who appealed to the Supreme Court to lift the ban said that this custom violated equality guaranteed under India’s constitution. They added that it was prejudiced against women and their right to worship.

Supporters of the ban argued that the practice had been in effect for centuries, and there was no need to change it now.

So, were any women able to enter last year?

In January, two women defied protesters and entered the shrine.

Kanakadurga, 39, and Bindu Ammini, 40, made history when they entered the Sabarimala shrine – but they had to do so under heavy police protection and were also met with massive protests after.

Right-wing groups, supported by India’s ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), demanded a state-wide shutdown after, and businesses and transportation became paralysed.

Across the state hundreds were arrested, and at least one person was killed in clashes.

In an interview with the BBC, the women said they felt it necessary to uphold women’s rights and they weren’t afraid of mobs “enraged” by their actions.

Media caption One of the women who defied protesters to enter the Sabarimala temple says she has ‘no fear’

“I am not afraid. But every time women make any progress, society has always made a lot of noise,” Ms Kanakadurga told the BBC in January.

But their decision to enter the temple also came at heavy personal cost.

She alleged that she had been beaten by her mother-in-law and abandoned. She has since filed for divorce.

Source: The BBC

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India