- Health watchdog warns that tobacco products are widely available on both social media and online retailers

The social network Weibo, China’s equivalent of Twitter, was highlighted as the platform where most of the banned promotion and selling were found, with nearly 43,000 adverts and listings, or 82 per cent of the total.
The South China Morning Post found that tobacco advertising and direct selling proliferates on Weibo, where searching for terms such as “cigarettes” and “women’s cigarettes” yielded almost 1,300 results, many of them offering WeChat and QQ contact information.
Five vendors found through Weibo offered various imported cigarettes such as Marlboro and South Korean brand Esse.
One seller claimed his wares were smuggled into China from places like the US. Another offered refunds for products that were confiscated, but only if they were bought for delivery within the same province.
A 10-packet carton of Kent cigarettes, an American brand, was selling for around 30 per cent less than the retail price in Beijing.

While advertising and online selling of tobacco are prohibited, e-cigarettes fall in a grey area. China’s tobacco agency has banned the sale of IQOS, a type of battery heated cigarette that delivers nicotine. However, regulations for non-nicotine vaporisers are less clear. These continue to be widely available online.
“In China, even toilet paper has standards. There are none for e-cigarettes,” Li Enze, the industrial law committee secretary for the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control, said.
“I think there needs to be a total ban on the sale of e-cigarettes until standards and regulations are set.”
E-cigarettes and vaporisers come in a variety of flavours and shapes to target women and young people, which poses a serious problem according to Li.
Under-18s can easily purchase vaporisers online and can be induced to smoking the real thing, he said.
Two sets of standards for e-cigarettes have been considered by the Standardisation Administration of China since 2017.
However, both were proposed by organisations associated with the state tobacco monopoly, which Li deemed a conflict of interest.
Source: SCMP


