Archive for ‘MPs’

12/03/2020

Huawei: Government wins vote after backbench rebellion

Man walks in front of a Huawei signImage copyright GETTY IMAGES

The government has defeated the first rebellion from its own MPs over plans to allow Huawei to be used in the UK’s 5G mobile network.

Thirty-eight Conservative rebels backed an amendment to end the Chinese firm’s participation in the project by the start of 2023.

Despite promises from the government of a new bill to address their concerns, rebel MPs pushed their plan to a vote.

But with a large Commons majority, the government defeated it by 24 votes.

Culture Minister Matt Warman said the government had heard the points “loud and clear”.

He added: “We will now engage intensively with colleagues across the House to make sure that we will make our case at every possible level…and we will underline that we will always put national security at the very top of our agenda.”

The use of Huawei technology in the 5G network was signed off by No 10 and security experts earlier this year, with the caveats of keeping the kit out of the most sensitive areas and capping its market share at 35%.

But Tory critics say the firm is an arm of the Chinese state and a risk to UK security – claims the firm rejects.

Other countries, including the US and Australia, have banned Huawei from their own networks and criticised the UK’s decision.

After the Commons vote, Huawei vice president Victor Zhang, said: “An evidence-based approach is needed, so we were disappointed to hear some groundless accusations asserted.

“The industry and experts agree that banning Huawei equipment would leave Britain less secure, less productive and less innovative.”

Presentational grey line
Analysis box by Norman Smith, assistant political editor

Today’s revolt on Huawei leaves Boris Johnson with one king-sized political headache.

It will likely prompt a bout of teeth gnashing in Downing Street that so many Tories should be ready to defy the PM so soon after he delivered them a whopping election victory.

But it will also sting that their ranks were made up of some of the most senior Tory MPs, including a solid block of former cabinet ministers.

In other words, these are not the sort of MPs who No 10 might expect to be able to bully back into line.

And this matters because the rebellion could pave the way for an even bigger one in the summer that could yet overturn the Huawei decision, with several Tory MPs making clear they are ready to join the rebels once the key 5G legislation comes back to the Commons.

A defeat for Mr Johnson over such a high profile issue would be a deeply wounding blow – all the more so since he went out on a limb to give his personal go-ahead to Huawei despite the fury of the White House and other allies.

Time perhaps for the PM to root out the paracetamol.

Presentational grey line

A group of Tory MPs, led by the party’s former leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith, put forward an amendment to the Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill to try and stop Huawei’s involvement.

The amendment would have seen firms classified as “high-risk vendors” by the National Cyber Security Centre be banned entirely from the UK’s 5G project by 31 December 2022.

Sir Iain said he and his colleagues were “genuinely concerned that this country has got itself far too bound in to a process in which we are reliant on untrusted vendors”.

Speaking in the Commons, the backbencher accused the Chinese government of spending 20 years “underbidding” other technology firms until Huawei dominated the market, and the outcome was a risk to the UK’s security.

He said using Huawei’s technology was a “statement of absence of thought by any government”, adding: “If defence of the realm is our number one priority, then this becomes demi-defence of the realm, and I am simply not prepared to put up with that.”

Media caption IDS warns UK “in thrall” to untrusted telecoms providers

Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden tried to reassure the group of backbenchers with the promise of bringing forward a Telecoms Security Bill before the summer recess “so all honourable members will be able to debate these points extensively”.

He also said the government wanted to work with its Five Eyes security partners – including the US – on alternative solutions so the UK could “get to a position where we do not have to use high-risk vendors at all”.

But Mr Dowden could not give a timetable for the exclusion of such companies, except to say it would be “in this Parliament” – meaning within the next five years.

As a result, Sir Iain pushed his amendment to a vote, marking the first Tory rebellion against the government since Boris Johnson won the election in December.

However, while 282 MPs from across the House voted in favour of the amendment, 306 MPs voted against, defeating it.

There were 38 Conservative MPs who rebelled against their government by voting for the amendment – including former international trade secretary Liam Fox, ex-Brexit secretary David Davis and former housing minister Esther McVey.

Conservative MP and Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, Tom Tugendhat, also voted in favour of the amendment, saying he did “not get the commitments” he wanted from the government.

“I am sorry that I could not support the government. I hope the policy will change before we come to the main Telecoms Security Bill before the summer.”

The Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill later passed without needing a vote.

Source: The BBC

13/02/2020

Why do many India MPs have criminal records?

Indian parliamentImage copyright AFP
Image caption A third of the current members of parliament have criminal cases pending against them

“We need to build a consensus on how to prevent individuals with a criminal record from contesting elections.”

A necessary, even obvious fundamental you would think of building the world’s largest democracy.

And when Sonia Gandhi, India’s most powerful politician, uttered those words three years ago, even her main opponent, the leader of the BJP agreed.

Yet since then, things have gone in the opposite direction – with more alleged lawbreakers among India’s lawmakers than ever, a third of the current parliament according to a watchdog called the Association for Democratic Reforms.

By some calculations, politicians with a criminal record are more likely to be elected than those with a clean slate – because, says the ADR, they have more illicit funds with which to buy votes.

And on Tuesday night, India’s cabinet sought to ensure there was even less chance of criminal politicians facing their own laws.

It issued an order overturning a Supreme Court ruling demanding the disqualification of any politician convicted for crimes punishable with more than two years in jail.

This was “to ensure that governance is not adversely impacted“, the government had argued, with no apparent irony intended.

Unusual speed

Arguably, of course, the government is right. Losing tainted local or national politicians – among them many accused murderers, rapists and fraudsters – could upset delicate political alliances and make it even harder to get laws passed.

So often derided for doing nothing, this time round the cabinet acted with unusual speed.

The urgency it appears is the impending conclusion of two cases involving key politicians, due before Prime Minister Manmohan Singh gets back to India from a trip to the US.

Protest against criminals contesting the parliamentary elections in Delhi on March 14, 2009Image copyright AFP
Image caption There’s been some criticism of criminal politicians

One concerns Lalu Prasad Yadav, a former railways minister and Congress party ally, charged with pocketing millions of dollars in subsidies for non-existent livestock.

Another concerns Congress MP Rashid Masood, already convicted of corruption and due to be sentenced next week. When the BBC asked his office for a comment, his assistant told us “he is unwell”.

“Don’t know whether to laugh or cry” tweeted MP Baijayant Panda in response to the government’s protective move.

He is a rare voice though inside the chamber campaigning against criminals sitting alongside him.

There’s been some other criticism outside, but not much. Indians have become very used to these kinds of shenanigans.

Almost forgotten already are calls in the Verma commission report into the December 16 Delhi gang rape case for all politicians accused of sexual crimes to be barred from office. Instead, six politicians charged with rape remain in office.

The opposition BJP has said it will oppose the cabinet order. But its record is just as murky, with even more accused criminals among its elected members in parliament and state assemblies than the Congress.

And with elections round the corner, none of the parties want to risk real reform right now, whatever they have signed up to in the past.

The world’s largest democracy is not alone in allowing so many questionable people to run it. Fellow Brics member Brazil has similar numbers of alleged criminals running the country.

The difference though is that in Brazil, brazen political abuses have provoked major protest.

But, says Indian MP Baijayant Panda: “This is a phase all democracies have gone through – look at the US.”

Voters will start to demand change, he predicts: “This is the last era of brazenness.”

Source: The BBC

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India