Archive for ‘Nepotism’

05/11/2012

* Premier Wen Jiabao calls for party probe into claims of family’s ‘hidden fortune’

Premier Wen is showing his true colours as a reformist and someone who believes that he is ‘clean’. Let’s hope the results of the investigation are made public so that we can all see how his family grew their fortune however vast or meagre.  This act also shows that he would dearly love to have the long-overdue “sunshine law” – which would require a public declaration of family assets by senior leaders – be finally put into effect.

SCMP: “The communist party leadership has launched a probe into the alleged family wealth of Wen Jiabao at the premier’s request, according to sources.

scm_news_wjb05.art_1.jpg

In a letter submitted to the Politburo Standing Committee, the party’s top decision-making body of which the premier is also a member, Wen asked for a formal inquiry into claims made by The New York Times.

A report on October 26 alleged his family had amassed at least US$2.7 billion of assets during his premiership. The Standing Committee had agreed to his request, the sources said.

It is unclear what the inquiry is likely to dig up, or when the results will be published, if at all.

The probe is expected to focus on the family’s alleged shares in Ping An, one of the mainland’s largest insurance companies.

The Times report, citing regulatory filings and corporate documents, said that in 2007 Wen’s family had a US$2.2 billion stake in Ping An.

It also alleged Wen’s 90-year-old mother had US$120 million of shares in the company.

According to the sources, several conservative party elders known to dislike the premier’s more liberal stance have urged him to provide detailed explanations on all the major allegations in the Times report, especially on the Ping An holdings.

Businesswoman Duan Weihong, whose company Taihong was described by the Times as the investment vehicle for the Wen family, told the newspaper she used the names of Wen’s relatives to register the ownership of the Ping An shares.

The party elders argued that this process, which would require registering their official ID numbers and obtaining their signatures, raised immediate questions about how Duan could obtain such personal details without consent from the Wen family.

Wen’s wife and his son have been plagued by corruption allegations for years.

But the family issued a statement, through two lawyers, for the first time on October 27, hitting back at the Times allegations about their “hidden riches” and threatening legal action.

It is unclear whether the family will publish further clarifications or go to the courts.

It is also understood the party elders were “unhappy” about the fact that major overseas Chinese websites – which usually swoop on negative news about the mainland’s top leaders – have carried a barrage of articles supporting Wen, quoting sources close to his family.

According to their reports, Wen had seized the opportunity to demand that a long-overdue “sunshine law” – which would require a public declaration of family assets by senior leaders – be finally put into effect.

He also said he would be happy to make public his family’s assets.

This would appear to be more than just an attempt by the image-conscious outgoing premier to defend his name, analysts say.

They say it shows he is keen to use the inquiry as one last chance to push forward the long-stalled “sunshine law”. Professor Zhu Lijia, of the Chinese Academy of Governance, said: “It is a ground-breaking step towards greater government openness and transparency.””

via Premier Wen Jiabao calls for party probe into claims of family’s ‘hidden fortune’ | South China Morning Post.

28/10/2012

* Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches

It will come as no surprise to Chinese citizens that Mr Wen and his family are very rich. They expect it of their leaders. It has always been thus. What will surprise many of them is the enormous scale of the wealth. This then will raise the thought as to whether other leaders are also enjoying such largesse which – at the end of the day – comes from the pockets of the hard working citizens.

NY Times: “Two lawyers who said they represented the family of Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China have issued a statement disputing aspects of a New York Times article about the family’s wealth, a rare instance of a powerful Chinese political family responding directly to a foreign media report.

The statement, published in The South China Morning Post on Sunday, said, “The so-called ‘hidden riches’ of Wen Jiabao’s family members in The New York Times’s report” did not exist.

After criticizing several points in the article, the statement hinted at the possibility of future legal action. “We will continue to make clarifications regarding untrue reports by The New York Times, and reserve the right to hold it legally responsible,” the statement said.

The statement reported in The Post, a Hong Kong newspaper, has not been obtained directly by The Times.

The statement was not a sweeping denial of the article. The statement acknowledged that some family members were active in business and that they “are responsible for all their own business activities.”

While the statement disputed that Mr. Wen’s mother had held assets, it did not address the calculation in the article that the family had controlled assets worth at least $2.7 billion.”

via Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches – NYTimes.com.

15/09/2012

* Coalgate: Supreme Court issues notice to Centre over coal block allocations

The Times of India: “The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre on coal block allocations and has asked the govt what action it proposes to take against illegal allotments and those allottees who breached the contract.

The apex court has asked the coal secretary to file affidavit answering 6 questions on a PIL seeking cancellation of all 194 coal mine blocks under controversy.

The apex court’s posers to the government includes —

Why competitive bidding process was not followed for allocation of coal blocks?

What were the guidelines for allocation of coal blocks and whether there was any deviation during actual allocation?

Why so many politicians and their relatives figure among the alleged irregular allottees?

Whether the guidelines for allocation overlooked the safety mechanism to render the allotments as largesse in favour of private parties?

Whether govt’s objective in coal block allocation has been achieved through the present mode of allocation, which was faulted by the CAG?

The apex court has asked the coal secretary to file a response in 8 weeks.

Turning down the Centre’s plea that the court should not go into the issue as it is being looked into by a Parliamentary committee, the apex court said “these are different exercises.”

A bench of justices R M Lodha and A R Dave said the petition raised serious questions and “it requires explanation from the government”.”

via Coalgate: Supreme Court issues notice to Centre over coal block allocations – The Times of India.

See also: https://chindia-alert.org/2012/09/07/india-parliament-ends-in-deadlock/

12/08/2012

* Cleaning up after Pranab Mukherjee leaves finance ministry

Reuters:”Pranab Mukherjee’s reign as Indian finance minister was stained by economic meddling and political favouritism. Now he is gone, and some of his excesses are being reversed. An enemy has been pardoned and a friend has not received a plum job. This could be the beginning of a better era.

Imagine if Tim Geithner had been accused of putting pressure on the securities regulator to protect some political friends. The U.S. Treasury Secretary would be in serious hot water. But when the former number two at the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) accused Mukherjee of something similar – putting pressure on the SEBI chairman to “manage” some high-profile corporate cases – there was little attention.

Rather, in a move that was all too typical of the Mukherjee regime, the finance ministry countered with allegations against the whistle-blower, K.M. Abraham. But the post-Mukherjee government is different. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has cleared Abraham.

In another development, the board of UTI, Asia’s oldest asset management company, is set to appoint a new chief executive. The position has been vacant for the past year and a half as the finance minister put pressure on the company, 26 percent owned by U.S. fund manager T. Rowe Price, to appoint the brother of one of Mukherjee’s most powerful advisors. The former political favourite, Jitesh Khosla, hasn’t made the new shortlist.

India’s new finance minister, P. Chidambaram, is also shaking up his own team. On Sunday he announced that the top officials in the revenue and expenditure departments would swap jobs. That seems to be a signal of a shift in the tax department’s priorities. It might pave the way for a reversal of Mukherjee’s damaging retrospective tax grabs.”

via India Insight.

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India