Posts tagged ‘Foreign direct investment’

09/01/2014

* India to seek foreign investment in giant, creaking rail network | Reuters

English: A speed board to show train speed lim...

English: A speed board to show train speed limits on the QR rail network in Queensland, Australia. The square/boxed limit is for Tilt Trains; the higher limit is because the Tilt Trains are capable of traveling through curved sections of track at faster speeds while maintaining passenger comfort. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

India will soon invite foreign businesses to help expand its once-mighty but now outdated railways, government sources said, in a move that would mark the opening up of one of the country\’s last great state-controlled industries.

Foreign investors will be allowed to fully own new services in suburban areas, high speed tracks, and connections to ports, mines and power installations, said two senior officials involved in the deliberations.

Existing passenger and freight network operations will not be open to foreign investors under the initiative, which seeks to ease bottlenecks that slow travel on the world\’s fourth-largest rail system.

\”The plan is to allow 100 percent foreign direct investment in suburban corridors, high-speed train systems, freight line projects implemented through public-private partnership,\” said an official at the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion.

via CORRECTED-India to seek foreign investment in giant, creaking rail network | Reuters.

Enhanced by Zemanta
20/10/2013

As China Workers Earn More, American Companies Shed Their Optimism – Forbes

It’s not that American multinationals don’t love China.  They do. But for different reasons now.  They like the growing middle class. They like the data on luxury spending and on car loving Chinese. What they don’t like is rising wages.

What brought them to China in the first place, cheap and abundant labor, is no longer the case. And that has American businessmen souring somewhat on China, according to the U.S. China Business Council (USCBC), a Washington DC-based lobby firm for American multinationals.

“Tempered optimism sums up corporate America’s view of the China business environment for the second year in a row,” said John Frisbee, president of the USCBC. While most respondents to the U.S. China Business Council’s annual survey said China remains among their company’s top five priorities, fewer respondents this year ranked China as their number one priority.

“For the second consecutive year, respondents suggested that companies’ optimism about the prospects for the market in the next five years has moderated,” Frisbee said in a statement Thursday. Rising costs for labor, lax intellectual property rights enforcement, competition with Chinese companies, and challenges with the licensing and business approval process continue to rank as the top issues of concern to foreign companies doing business in China. But the number one issue was the fact that Chinese workers are earning more than ever.

One company in the survey, which was not named, said that, “Costs, particularly in major metropolitan areas, are moving to a point that China is no longer world-competitive.”

Despite higher labor costs, more than 90% of survey respondents report that their China operations are profitable, the highest percentage reported since USCBC began surveying its membership.

But looking into their crystal ball shows a future China that’s radically different from its past. This is no longer a Happy Meal toy economy, and corporate investors know it.

The vast majority of respondents have expressed concern about rising costs since the question was first asked in 2007.

Only in 2009 as the global recession was at its height and wage pressures eased did that number dip below 80%. Human resources costs have consistently been the specific cost of most concern, reaching 92% in this year’s survey.

Top Ten China Concerns

1. Cost Increases

2. Competition with Chinese Companies in China

3. Administrative Licensing

4. Human Resources: Talent Recruitment and Retention

5. Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement

6. Uneven Enforcement/Implementation of Chinese Laws

7. Nondiscrimination/National Treatment

8. Transparency

9. Standards and Comformity Assessment

10. Foreign Investment Restrictions

In 2007, 88% of respondents were worried about rising labor costs, dropping to 70% in 2009.

via As China Workers Earn More, American Companies Shed Their Optimism – Forbes.

22/01/2013

* Chidambaram: See ‘First Green Shoots’ of Recovery

WSJ: “India’s finance minister said the “first green shoots” of the country’s economic revival are evident but growth isn’t expected to surpass 5.7% this year, the bottom end of the government’s revised growth target.

English: India's Minister of Finance Palaniapp...

English: India’s Minister of Finance Palaniappan Chidambaram is the special guest at a plenary session titled Risks to India’s Economy in a Post-Crisis World held at the World Economic Forum’s India Economic Summit 2008 in New Delhi, 16-18 November 2008. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In Hong Kong to meet investors ahead of the budget presentation for fiscal 2013, P. Chidambaram told reporters that growth next year should be in the upper ranges of the 6%-7% target and that the economy should return to its potential growth rate, around 8%, by the following year.”

via Chidambaram: See ‘First Green Shoots’ of Recovery – WSJ.com.

17/01/2013

* China Loses Edge As Worlds Factory Floor

WSJ: “China is losing its competitive edge as a low-cost manufacturing base, new data suggest, with makers of everything from handbags to shirts to basic electronic components relocating to cheaper locales like Southeast Asia.

imageThe shift—illustrated in weakened foreign investment in China—has pluses and minuses for an economy key to global growth. Beijing wants to shift to higher-value production and to see incomes rise. But a de-emphasis on manufacturing puts pressure on leaders to make sure jobs are created in other sectors to keep the worlds No. 2 economy humming.

Total foreign direct investment flowing into China fell 3.7% in 2012 to $111.72 billion, the Ministry of Commerce said Wednesday, the first annual decline since the fallout from the global financial crisis in 2009.

Then, a 13% fall in foreign investment into China reflected dire conditions for business in the U.S. and Europe, and global risk aversion, which choked off capital flows. Economists say the drop in 2012 is partly cyclical, driven by slowing overall growth in China and Europe’s prolonged debt crisis.

But it also is the result of a long-term trend of rising wages and other costs that have made China less attractive, especially for basic manufacturing, economists say.

By contrast, foreign direct investment into Thailand grew by about 63% in 2012, and Indonesia investment was up 27% in the first nine months of last year.

Coronet SpA, an Italian maker of synthetic leather with production in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, plans a new factory in Vietnam to take advantage of lower labor costs and to be closer to its customers in the shoe and handbag businesses, many of which have already moved there.

via China Loses Edge As Worlds Factory Floor – WSJ.com.

See also: https://chindia-alert.org/2012/12/07/apple-to-return-some-mac-production-to-u-s-in-2013/

10/12/2012

* Uproar in Rajya Sabha over Wal-Mart lobbying disclosure; opposition seeks probe

Retail entry into India; two steps forward, one step back?

Times of India: “The issue of FDI in retail came to haunt the government again in Parliament with a united opposition demanding an inquiry and reply from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on reports of Wal-Mart spending huge money to lobby for entry into the Indian market.

Forcing two adjournments in the Rajya Sabha before lunch, members from BJP, CPM, CPI, SP, JD-U, Trinamool Congress, AGP and AIADMK said the measure should be withdrawn as “corruption” has come to fore now because lobbying is illegal in India.

Raising the issue during Zero Hour, Ravishankar Prasad (BJP) said apprehensions were raised earlier also about Wal-Mart spending huge money to lobby for entering the Indian market, which has now been proved true.

“Wal-Mart has in its lobbying disclosure report to the US Senate said it has spent Rs 125 crore on lobbying and $ 3 million have been spent in 2012 itself for entering the Indian market.

“Lobbying is illegal in India. Lobbying is a kind of bribe. If Wal-Mart has said that hundreds of crores of rupees were spent in India, then it is a kind of bribe. Government should tell who was given this bribe. This raises a question mark on the implementation of FDI in retail,” Prasad said.

He was supported by members from other opposition parties with TMC leader D Bandopadhyay waving a newspaper report and CPM member P Rajeeve asking for an “independent inquiry” into the whole episode alleging that there are some reports saying Wal-Mart invested money even before FEMA was amended.

“This is bribery,” he said as the opposition members shouted slogans in favour of withdrawing FDI.

The opposition was reacting to media report that global retail giant Wal-Mart — waiting for years to open its supermarkets in India — had been lobbying with the US lawmakers since 2008 to facilitate its entry into the highly lucrative Indian market.

via Uproar in Rajya Sabha over Wal-Mart lobbying disclosure; opposition seeks probe – The Times of India.

05/10/2012

* India Moves Again to Ease Way for Foreign Investment

It’s a case of “in for a penny in for a pound”. If the Opposition is stirred up already against the opening up of retail business to FDI, why not jump in with insurance and pensions too.

New York Times: “In their second major effort in two months to revive a flagging economy, Indian policy makers on Thursday proposed letting foreign investors take a bigger stake in insurance and pension companies.

The measures, which were approved by the cabinet, will now go to the Parliament, where their passage is far from certain. The national governing coalition led by the Indian National Congress Party does not have a majority in the legislature, and opposition parties and even some of its own allies have said they do not support greater foreign investment.

Still, anticipation of the changes sent the India’s benchmark stock index Sensex up 1 percent to its highest close in more than a year.

The index has rallied about 5 percent since the middle of September, when the government allowed greater foreign investment in retailing and aviation and reduced government energy subsidies.

Under the proposal approved by the cabinet, foreign companies would be allowed to acquire up to 49 percent in Indian insurance and pension firms, a change that both Indian and overseas firms have long lobbied for, saying that the sectors needed more capital to grow.

Foreign companies are now allowed to hold a 26 percent stake in insurance companies but are not allowed to invest in pension firms. India’s insurance premiums total about $40 billion a year and its pension industry has assets of $300 million.

The changes will most likely face stiff opposition in Parliament, which was paralyzed during its last session after the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party repeatedly interrupted proceedings to demand the resignation of the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, in connection with a scandal involving the allocation of coal concessions. The next session of Parliament begins in November.

Opposition officials, who were involved in drafting the proposals at an earlier stage of the lawmaking process, have said that they would not support an increase in foreign investment to 49 percent. Some of the government’s allies have also said they do not support the change.

“Legislation in democracy is a process of negotiation and discussion,” Palaniappan Chidambaram, India’s finance minister, said at a news conference.

“Obviously, we need to talk. We will sit and talk to all parties, especially the principal opposition.””

via India Moves Again to Ease Way for Foreign Investment – NYTimes.com.

17/07/2012

* Chinese Businesses Get Advice on U.S. Investment

WSJ: “Looking to ease the way for Chinese investment in the U.S., the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is advising Chinese businesses not to count on “personal relationships” with government officials as a key to success.

The advice came in a report prepared by the U.S. Chamber for an investment forum Tuesday in Beijing. The event, co-hosted by the China Center for International Economic Exchanges, a Chinese government think tank, was expected to draw about 400 business executives and government officials, current and past.

A subsidiary of Aviation Industry Group of China last year bought Cirrus Industries, a Minnesota maker of propeller aircraft.

The U.S. Chamber said it was acting on its own initiative, though the U.S. government, seeking to lift economic growth, also has been trying to encourage Chinese investment. Chinese business leaders regularly say they are interested in investing in the U.S. but fear political opposition.

“We’re trying to showcase Chinese investment in the U.S.,” said Myron Brilliant, a senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber. “In a lot of areas there aren’t a lot of hurdles to investment.”

The 38-page report is based on interviews with Chinese business officials who have invested in the U.S. Some of its suggestions are obvious: “win-win cooperation can create great opportunities,” said advice attributed to Cirrus Industries Inc., a Duluth, Minn., propeller-aircraft maker purchased last year by a subsidiary of Aviation Industry Group of China.

But other advice reflects important differences between how business is done in the U.S. and in China. “Unlike in China, personal relations with officials play a very small part in the enforcement of laws and regulation,” said the report’s introduction.

Another tidbit for would-be Chinese investors: “The U.S. media [are] completely independent of the government, so even if some local officials welcome your investment, others might voice opposition in the media. Do not be discouraged by this.”

Chinese direct investment in the U.S. last year totaled $4.5 billion, according to New York market research firm Rhodium Group, a tiny portion of the foreign-direct investment in the U.S. The Commerce Department, which uses a different methodology from Rhodium, said FDI in the U.S. reached $227 billion in 2011.

via Chinese Businesses Get Advice on U.S. Investment – WSJ.com.

16/03/2012

* India: ‘Need for urgent reforms as corruption, civil society activism delay decisions’

The Hindu: “The government on Thursday gave a clarion call for urgent economic reforms while conceding that corruption scandals and compulsions of coalition politics have slowed down the decision-making process, as a result of which it is faced with fiscal slippages in 2011-12.

Making a strong pitch for raising tax resources and higher compliance, the Economic Survey 2011-12, tabled in Parliament on Thursday in tandem with the Reserve Bank in its mid-quarter policy review, expressed serious concern over the deteriorating state of government finances and stressed the need for fiscal consolidation if inflation is to be tamed.

Highlighting inflation and fiscal slippages as among the major challenges confronting the economy, the Survey said a slackening in the pace of reforms and high-profile corruption scandals along with “welcome civil society activism” have led to delay in decision-making by civil servants.

Tabled in the Lok Sabha by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, the Survey said “coalition politics and federal considerations played their roles in holding up economic reforms on several fronts, ranging from diesel and LPG pricing to FDI in retail” and also pointed to the economic slowdown partly resulting from domestic issues “like pressures of democratic politics.”

In concert with the apex bank on the need for fiscal consolidation, the Survey said: “The principal way in which this has to be achieved is by raising tax-GDP ratio and cutting down wasteful expenditures.”

The Survey noted that the dismal economic performance this fiscal should be a “wake-up call” but, at the same time, expressed cautious optimism that the GDP growth in 2012-13 would go up to 7.6 per cent following a moderation in inflation and consequent low interest rates.

“The growth rate of real GDP [is expected] to pick up to 7.6 per cent [plus or minus 0.25 per cent] in 2012-13 and faster beyond that,” the Survey said and noted that economic expansion this fiscal would moderate to a three-year low at 6.9 per cent. Arguing out a case for fiscal consolidation, tax reforms, opening of the multi-brand retail to global chains, freeing of diesel prices and the need for honesty among political leaders and policy-makers, the Survey said that although government’s fiscal deficit was likely to significantly go off the target of 4.6 per cent of GDP this fiscal, it would narrow down to 4.1 per cent in 2012-13 on the strength of a pick-up in economic activities. After tabling the pre-budget document, the Finance Minister said: “It [the Survey] charts economic development and challenges faced during the fiscal year. It is a vital input for the preparation of the budget.”

At a press briefing later during the day, Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu, prime architect of the document, said growth in manufacturing and agriculture sectors were likely to be key drivers in the next fiscal. “There could be one more year of a slight slowing down of investment and saving rates. We expect… rates to pick up handsomely after that,” he said.”

via The Hindu : News / National : ‘Need for urgent reforms as corruption, civil society activism delay decisions’.

Related page: https://chindia-alert.org/political-factors/indian-tensions/

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India