Posts tagged ‘politics’

28/10/2012

* Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches

It will come as no surprise to Chinese citizens that Mr Wen and his family are very rich. They expect it of their leaders. It has always been thus. What will surprise many of them is the enormous scale of the wealth. This then will raise the thought as to whether other leaders are also enjoying such largesse which – at the end of the day – comes from the pockets of the hard working citizens.

NY Times: “Two lawyers who said they represented the family of Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China have issued a statement disputing aspects of a New York Times article about the family’s wealth, a rare instance of a powerful Chinese political family responding directly to a foreign media report.

The statement, published in The South China Morning Post on Sunday, said, “The so-called ‘hidden riches’ of Wen Jiabao’s family members in The New York Times’s report” did not exist.

After criticizing several points in the article, the statement hinted at the possibility of future legal action. “We will continue to make clarifications regarding untrue reports by The New York Times, and reserve the right to hold it legally responsible,” the statement said.

The statement reported in The Post, a Hong Kong newspaper, has not been obtained directly by The Times.

The statement was not a sweeping denial of the article. The statement acknowledged that some family members were active in business and that they “are responsible for all their own business activities.”

While the statement disputed that Mr. Wen’s mother had held assets, it did not address the calculation in the article that the family had controlled assets worth at least $2.7 billion.”

via Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches – NYTimes.com.

28/10/2012

* Rahul Gandhi MIA

It is becoming clear to any innocent bystander that Rahul Gandhi is not interested in taking a leading role in Indian national politics. But will he be able to resist the urging from his Grandmother and the Congress |Party?  Only time will  tell.

WSJ: “The question has swirled around New Delhi for months: Is Rahul Gandhi, scion of India’s most powerful political family, finally poised to take on a major role in running the country’s government?

The answer, apparently, is no. India announced a leadership reshuffle on Sunday that brought several new faces into ministerial positions, but Mr. Gandhi wasn’t among them.

The 42-year-old, a descendant of three past prime ministers, is a general secretary in the ruling Congress party. He has long been viewed as a prime-minister-in-waiting and is widely seen as the face of the Congress party as national elections approach in 2014.

But political analysts say Mr. Gandhi may be running out of time to make himself a credible candidate by showing voters he’s willing to take on real governing duties. “If you’re projected as a prime minister candidate and you don’t take responsibility, that doesn’t say a lot about you,” said Pradip Datta, a political science professor at Delhi University. “It can be interpreted that you don’t want responsibility.””

via Rahul Gandhi MIA – India Real Time – WSJ.

See also:

28/10/2012

* Reading Between the Lines on Chinese Judicial Reform

Another day, another set of reforms. It’s as if China is catching up with itself.

Reuters: “Of the many broken institutions in China calling out to be fixed as Beijing prepares to welcome a new generation of leaders, the country’s judicial system is among the most important. In an era of improved communication and increasing public scrutiny, the consistently poor performance of China’s courts, which are controlled by the Communist Party, threaten to seriously undermine the party’s legitimacy. The question is whether China’s leaders would ever consider loosening their grip on the judicial system enough to solve the problems that plague it.

A recent government white paper on judicial reform hints that they might. Released earlier this month by the Information Office of China’s State Council (China’s cabinet), the 20-page document is devoted mostly to declaring that various institutions within the judicial system have been improved and that they are continuing to improve. But it begins and ends in ways that suggest new perspectives.

Bloomberg News

In its preface, the white paper tasks the judicial system to meet a high standard. “The judicial system is a major component of the political system, while judicial impartiality is a significant guarantee of social justice,” it says. adding that “due to the development of the socialist market economy, the comprehensive implementation of the rule of law, and the increasing demands of the public for justice, China’s judicial system urgently needs to be reformed, improve and developed.” The conclusion likewise makes a relatively bold statement, saying judicial reform “is regarded as an important part of China’s political system reform.”

The white paper is also interesting for what it doesn’t say.

Unlike previous Chinese government white papers on law, the Communist Party (CPC) is never mentioned in the latest document. Previous white papers on legal issues published in 2008 and 2011 both emphasized that reform is to be carried out “under the leadership of the CPC.”   This newest document instead celebrates the accomplishments of “China” not the CPC, while also invoking judicial reform as “an important part of China’s political system reform.”  Where did the party go and what does its omission signify?

Also missing from the white paper is in any direct attack on the problems that need to be addressed, other than a vague reference to “defects and rigidity” in the judicial system.  Nothing is said about core problems, such as the lack of judicial independence or the legal culture of police, judges and prosecutors that lingers from the Maoist period and fosters widespread disregard of laws already in effect.”

via Reading Between the Lines on Chinese Judicial Reform – China Real Time Report – WSJ.

See also: https://chindia-alert.org/prognosis/chinese-challenges/

22/10/2012

* China leftists urge parliament not to expel Bo Xilai

Reuters: “A group of Chinese leftists has issued a public letter calling on the country’s largely rubber stamp parliament not to expel disgraced former top leader Bo Xilai from its ranks, saying the move is legally questionable and politically motivated.

China's former Chongqing Municipality Communist Party Secretary Bo Xilai (L) and former Deputy Mayor of Chongqing Wang Lijun (R) attend a session of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) of the Chongqing Municipal Committee, in Chongqing municipality, January 7, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer

Stripping membership from Bo – the one-time Communist Party chief of Chongqing who is accused of abusing power, taking huge bribes and other crimes – also removes his immunity from prosecution, and paves the way for formal charges against him.

Bo’s ouster has exposed deep rifts in the party between his leftist backers, who are nostalgic for the revolutionary era of Mao Zedong, and reformers, who advocate for faster political and economic reforms.

The letter, carried on the far-left Chinese-language website “Red China” and addressed to the parliament’s standing committee, says the party is fuelling doubts about the accusations against Bo by refusing to discuss them publicly.

“What is the reason provided for expelling Bo Xilai? Please investigate the facts and the evidence,” says the letter. “Please announce to the people evidence that Bo Xilai will be able to defend himself in accordance with the law.”

Parliament and its members are there to provide oversight and make laws, not to “act as a rubber stamp” for attacks on people for personal reasons by political factions, it added.”

via China leftists urge parliament not to expel Bo Xilai | Reuters.

20/10/2012

* India pays homage to 1962 martyrs for first time

The Hindu: “Paying homage to soldiers who fought in the 1962 Indo-China war, Defence Minister A.K. Antony on Saturday ruled out any possibility of the repeat of the war and said armed forces were confident of protecting the country against any such threat.

(From Left) Defence Minister A.K.Antony, Marshal of the Indian Air Force Arjan Singh, Chief of Army Staff Gen. Bikram Singh, Naval Chief Admiral D.K. Joshi, Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal N.A.K.Browne pay homage at Amar Jawan Jyoti to mark the 50th anniversary of India-China war, in New Delhi on Saturday. Photo: Sandeep Saxena

This is the first time that the Indian defence establishment has honoured the dead and participants of the 1962 war officially.

“I would like to assure the nation that India of today is not the India of 1962. Over the years, successive governments learning lessons from the past strengthened our capabilities and modernised our armed forces… we are confident armed forces will be able to protect the border in event of any threat,” he said on the sidelines of an event to honour the soldiers of the 1962 war on its 50th anniversary.

The Defence Minister was asked to assess the threat from China and India’s preparation to tackle it.

In the war, India suffered defeat at the hands of the Chinese Army which went to capture large portion of Indian territory.

The Defence Minister, who along with Minister of State for Defence M.M. Pallam Raju, Marshal of the Air Force Arjan Singh and the three services chiefs paid homage to the 1962 war heroes and laid wreaths at Amar Jawan Jyoti, said successive governments have learnt lessons from the war and strengthened military capabilities and developed infrastructure.

“We will vigorously continue to strengthen our capabilities,” the Defence Minister said.

Mr. Antony also noted that India was holding dialogue with China to find a solution to the long-pending border dispute and has established a mechanism to “immediately settle” any tensions on the border.”

via The Hindu : News / National : Nation pays homage to 1962 martyrs for first time.

20/10/2012

* Indian Govt wants to use technology to curb dishonesty

If only corruption can be solved so easily with technology.

Times of India: “With United Progressive Alliance(UPA) facing allegations of corruption, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Saturday said his government wants to use new technology to curb dishonesty and bring transparency in governance.

Aadhaar to help millions get benefits of government schemes

Speaking at the launch of Aadhar-enabled Service Delivery system, he said the unique identity numbers will help 1.5 crore students get scholarships, two crore elderly get old age pensions, three crore to avail health insurance and five crore people get the benefits of MNREGA.

The scheme is aimed at directly transferring cash to beneficiaries under social schemes such as MNREGA and pension.

“By giving benefits directly to the needy, complaints of dishonesty and delay will reduce,” Singh said at a function where he handed over Aadhar number ’21 crore’ to a villager here.

“Our government wants to use new technology in a big way to curb dishonesty and bring transparency in governance. Aadhar is an important step in this direction,” he said.

In the past two years, he said, the government has enrolled 24 crore people for Aadhar and “we expect to give Aadhar cards to around 60 crore by 2014”.

Addressing the function, UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi said the Aadhar scheme gives identity to the common man and is a tool to claim benefits.

Using the Aadhar card, she said, the common man can claim his rights anywhere in the country.

“The Aadhar card will help the government in ensuring that subsidy reaches its intended beneficiaries directly and the poor will not have to run from pillar to post to claim their rights,” she said.”

via Govt wants to use technology to curb dishonesty: PM – The Times of India.

20/10/2012

* Q&A: China’s new leaders

Another “must read” article from the BBC

China’s ruling Communist Party is about to hold an important congress and usher in sweeping leadership changes which could have a profound impact on the country’s future direction.

Wen Jiabao (L), Xi Jinping (C) and Hu Jintao (R) - archive image

With China now the world’s second largest economy and an increasingly important global player, the changes will be closely watched around the world. What are the main issues?

What is the party congress?

The congress is held every five years and is a platform to announce party policies and personnel changes in the party leadership.

More than 2,200 delegates from across China will gather in Beijing for the congress, which opens on 8 November.

The congress will be a well-choreographed display of power and unity, but the proceedings will mostly take place behind closed doors.

Most, if not all, of the outcomes will have been settled among top leaders before the congress gets under way.

It is not clear how long the meeting will go on for. But recent congresses have typically lasted seven days.

Why is it important?

This year’s congress is particularly important because it will endorse a once-in-a-decade leadership succession.

The party sets strict age limits for its leaders and seven out of the nine current members of the all-powerful Politburo Standing Committee – the party’s ruling body – are expected to step down. They include President Hu Jintao, who is head of the party and China’s head of state, and Premier Wen Jiabao, who is like a prime minister in charge of the government.

Immediately after the Congress ends, a new leadership will be unveiled to waiting journalists, and walk out in order of seniority.

The new leadership, the make-up of which has been determined in advance, will rule China for the next 10 years.

Who will China’s new leaders be?

Vice-President Xi Jinping is expected to replace Hu Jintao as the party’s general secretary after the congress, and become state president early next year.

The National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) will convene on 8 November in Beijing

He is one of the select group of “princelings” – top party officials who are descended from former party grandees.

Vice-Premier Li Keqiang, a close ally of Mr Hu, is tipped to replace Wen Jiabao as premier.

There has been a lot of speculation as to who the other Politburo Standing Committee members will be, and its final line-up will be closely watched for hints as to China’s future direction.

It has been widely reported that the Standing Committee will shrink from nine members to seven, in an effort to streamline decision-making.

How are new leaders selected?

In theory, the party congress elects members of the Central Committee, who in turn elect the politburo, including its Standing Committee, China’s top decision-making body.

But in practice, the process has always been top-down rather than bottom-up, and the congress is really a rubber stamp for top leaders’ decisions.

Under Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, the paramount leaders named their own successors.

Now that the era of political strongmen is over, the selection of new leaders has become a murky process of intrigue and horse trading among various party factions and interest groups.

Though Li Keqiang was believed to be Hu Jintao’s favourite candidate, Xi Jinping emerged on top because he was acceptable to all party factions.

What difference will the new leaders make?

Advocates of reform are calling on the new leadership to carry out urgent reforms to prevent economic and social problems from evolving into a crisis that could loosen the Communist Party’s grip on power.

In particular, they warn that, without incremental political reform, the unchecked powers of the state risk suffocating growth and exacerbating popular discontent.

It was recently reported that Mr Xi, the leader-in-waiting, hinted that he has heard the calls for him to take a bolder path.

But any more daring reform could face opposition from powerful interest groups, including party factions that chose the new leaders in the first place.

What happens to leaders who retire?

Retired Chinese leaders often continue to wield great influence from behind the scenes.

After Jiang Zemin stepped down as party leader in 2002, he remained as head of the Central Military Commission for two years, setting a precedent some say Hu Jintao may now seek to repeat.

Even party elders without official posts can stay active, especially in the lead-up to leadership successions.

Both Jiang and his rival Li Ruihuan, a former leader close to Hu Jintao, have reportedly made public appearances in a bid to boost their own factions.

With party elders still holding sway, new leaders can be quite constrained when they first take office.

Do we really know what’s happening, or is it educated guesswork?

China started opening to the world in 1978, and observers now know vastly more about its people and society than ever before.

But China’s political system remains opaque and secretive.

For example, just weeks before the congress, Xi Jinping was not heard from for two weeks, sparking a flurry of online rumours which Beijing’s official silence only served to fan.

One insight we will get into the party’s latest thinking will be Hu Jintao’s much-anticipated “political report”, to be delivered on 8 November.

Chinese political speeches are usually full of jargon and hard to decipher. But observers will pore over the report for new watchwords

via BBC News – Q&A: China’s new leaders.

20/10/2012

* How China is ruled: Communist Party

This is a “must read” article from the BBC.

Communist Party

The Chinese Communist Party’s more than 80m-strong membership makes it the biggest political party in the world. Its tight organisation and ruthlessness help explain why it is also still in power.

The party oversees and influences many aspects of people’s lives – what they learn at school and watch on TV, even the number of children they are allowed.

It is made up largely of government officials, army officers, farmers, model workers and employees of state-owned companies.

It is unrepresentative of China as a whole. Only a quarter of its members are women, for example. It is also obsessive about control, regularly showing itself capable of great brutality in suppressing dissent or any challenge to its authority.

The party is still the guiding hand

Joining the party brings significant privileges. Members get access to better information, and many jobs are only open to members. Most significantly in China, where personal relationships are often more important than ability, members get to network with decision-makers influencing their careers, lives or businesses.

Pyramid structure

To join, applicants need the backing of existing members and to undergo exhaustive checks and examination by their local party branch. They then face a year’s probation, again involving assessments and training.

The party has a pyramid structure resting on millions of local-level party organisations across the country and reaching all the way up to the highest decision-making bodies in Beijing.

In theory, the top of the pyramid is the National Party Congress, which is convened once every five years and brings together more than 2,000 delegates from party organisations across the country.

The congress’ main function is to “elect” a central committee of about 200 full members and 150 lower-ranking or “alternate” members”, though in fact almost all of these people are approved in advance.

In turn, the central committee’s main job is to elect a new politburo and its smaller, standing committee, where real decision-making powers lie.

via BBC News – How China is ruled: Communist Party.

19/10/2012

* Rahul Gandhi can change Congress’ image with cabinet entry

Will Rahul Gandhi step up to his heritage and take the reins or forever stand in the sidelines?  And if he does, will it make a difference to India or will she continue as she is?

Reuters: “India is asking the same old question after news reports said Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Wednesday before a possible cabinet reshuffle later this month: will Gandhi be one of the cards in his deck?

Gandhi’s entry into the government would be the only opportunity for him to prove that he has what it takes to one day rule India. He’s seen as the prime-minister-in-waiting, and a cabinet post would better equip him to deal with the hurly-burly of Indian politics.

Several cabinet posts are vacant, and some cabinet ministers hold additional portfolios. And even after passing market-moving reform measures, Congress’ task of boosting its public image is incomplete.

If you go by age, Gandhi is 42, just about ripe. David Cameron became the youngest prime minister of Britain at 44. When Barack Obama took over as the 44th American president, he was 47. Gandhi’s grandmother and India’s first woman to serve as prime minister, Indira Gandhi, was appointed Congress president when she was in her early 40′s.

But Rahul has never expressed willingness to join the government or lead the Congress party. He wants to work with the people. The Uttar Pradesh poll disaster, in which the Congress party suffered a major setback, perhaps makes it more attractive for him to take the humble approach.

Gandhi’s biggest problem is communication, which is also true of his mother, Congress President Sonia Gandhi. How can you be in politics and not talk? It is tough to imagine India’s top leaders sharing a stage for debate, speaking to each other in a civilised manner, or worse yet, barely at all and without any melodrama.

If Rahul wants to be a mass leader and win hearts, he should reach out to people. In this day and age, communication is a Twitter account or a camera link away. There’s a lot to talk about that doesn’t involve implying that 70 percent of Punjab’s youth are junkies … from corruption to social activism to the state of the economy and ways to fix it.”

via Rahul Gandhi can change Congress’ image with cabinet entry | India Insight.

18/10/2012

* Feuds in the Pacific over islands: it’s not simply a case of China against everyone else

Unfortunately for China, its recent military posturing has obscured the fact that territorial claims in the South China Sea is not only between China and its neighbours but endemic.

WorldTimes: “When it comes to feuds in the Pacific over islands and what lies beneath, it’s not simply a case of China against everyone else. Depending on the dispute, it’s also South Korea vs. Japan, Japan vs. Taiwan, Taiwan vs. Vietnam, Vietnam vs. Cambodia and numerous other permutations — for many of the same reasons supposedly behind China’s actions. Resource grab. Patriotic posturing. Historical baggage (mostly to do with Japan’s brutal occupation of most of East Asia before and through World War II). Referring to the South China Sea, former ASEAN secretary general Rodolfo Severino, who now heads Singapore’s Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, wrote recently that “all claimants feel their footholds are essential to what they consider their national interests … This clash of national interests … makes it most difficult even to appear to be making compromises on national integrity or maritime regimes and, thus, almost impossible to resolve [the] disputes.””

Read more: http://world.time.com/2012/08/19/why-asias-maritime-disputes-are-not-just-about-china/#ixzz29dhhV78F

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India