Archive for ‘national dream’

23/11/2013

Reform in China: Let quite a few flowers bloom | The Economist

THE jury is in. After months of speculation and an initial summary last week, the final 22,000-character overview of China’s “third plenum” was published on November 15th. In the economic sphere the document turned out to be bolder than the initial summary suggested. The new party boss, Xi Jinping, wants to push through changes that have stalled over the past decade. As the document itself says: “We should let labour, knowledge, technology, management and capital unleash their dynamism, let all sources of wealth spread and let all people enjoy more fruits of development fairly.” Quite.

It is by no means certain that Mr Xi will be able to do all he wants to (see article), but it is clear he has won the battle so far. Economically, he is proving himself an heir to Deng Xiaoping, China’s great reformer, and not the closet Maoist that some had feared. Conservative forces seeking to stifle reformist voices have been quieted, at least for the time being.

The document’s interest lies not just in the economic reforms, which were anticipated. More striking were some of the social changes the document announced, such as the relaxation of the one-child policy. A couple in which one parent is an only child will be allowed to have two children, and the policy is likely to be loosened even further. In another widely welcomed move, labour camps—in which around 190,000 people, including political and religious activists, are detained—are to be abolished.

But possibly the most important announcements were buried deep in the document and grabbed fewer headlines. Two moves in particular showed that the party is sensitive to the ferment in Chinese society and the demands for greater liberty and accountability that accompany it.

In the past 30 years China has gone from a totalitarian society to one in which people can usually work where they want, marry whom they want, travel where they want (albeit with varying degrees of hassle for those from the countryside and ethnic-minority regions). In ten years internet penetration has gone from minimal to almost universal. Old welfare structures have broken down, with little to take their place. Ordinary people are being empowered by new wealth and participation, through microblogs, and by becoming consumers and property owners. Change is bubbling up from the bottom and the system cannot contain it.

An uNGOvernable state

Society is becoming too complex for the old structures to handle. Hence the government’s decision to allow the development of what it calls “social organisations”. In essence these are NGOs. The party dislikes the idea of anything non-governmental and has long regarded NGOs as a Trojan horse for Western political ideas and subversion, but it is coming to realise that they could solve some of its problems—caring for the sick, elderly and poor, for instance. The growth of civil society is not just important in itself. It is also the bridge to the future, linking today’s economic reforms to whatever putative future political reform might come.

Equally important is the issue of judicial reform. China’s hopelessly corrupt judges are unpopular. The party resolution floats the idea of “judicial jurisdiction systems that are suitably separated from administrative areas”; that is, local judiciaries that are not controlled and paid for by local officials. Though some observers doubt this will happen, if it does it could be the start of a system of basic checks and balances, which would make officials more accountable.

That these two gestures towards reform were mentioned at all is encouraging; that they were barely visible to the untrained eye shows the party’s ambivalence towards liberalisation. But it must push ahead. Its planned economic reforms will surely generate not just wealth, but more pressure for political change. Unless the party responds, there could be an explosion. If Mr Xi is inclined to wobble, he should remember the advice in the plenary document: “Dare to gnaw through even tough bones, dare to ford dangerous rapids, break through the fetters of ideological concepts with even greater resolution.”

via Reform in China: Let quite a few flowers bloom | The Economist.

01/11/2013

Zhang Xin: the billionaire queen of China’s new skyline | The Times

At nine she was homeless; as a teenager, she worked in sweatshops. So how did Zhang Xin become one of China’s richest women, asks Leo Lewis.

Zhang Xin in front of the Galaxy Soho construction site, 2011

Inside the penthouse premises of the exclusive Beijing American Club, China’s most powerful woman aims a quiet smile at a circle of armchairs; she targets each occupant with a flash of eye contact and brings the exquisitely elite gathering to attention. Silence falls.

Property developer Zhang Xin, queen of the Beijing skyline, is the chief executive of Soho China, one of the country’s most influential property companies. She is immaculately but not ostentatiously dressed in a scarlet blouse, chairing a discussion that touches delicately on the future of China, of the Communist Party and of China’s engagement with the outside world. Sharing her sofa, and the main speaker for the evening, is Peter Mandelson; his book The Third Man: Life at the Heart of New Labour, newly translated into Chinese, is already popular within the higher echelons of Party leadership. Around them sits a unique assembly of Chinese business leaders, diplomats, journalists and high financiers. It is an evening that reflects Zhang’s status as one of the world’s greatest female success stories.

Over the past decade, Zhang, 48, has become a role model for women, for the ambitious poor and for ordinary Chinese in general. The 6.7 million people who follow her on Weibo (China’s equivalent of Twitter) are doing so for a reason: the Chinese Government may try to co-opt the concept of a “Chinese Dream” for political ends, but Zhang is its living embodiment – a woman who has risen from her beginnings as a teenage sweatshop worker to become one of the wealthiest women on the planet, overseeing an empire worth $3.6 billion (£2.2 billion).

Zhang’s parents were educated Chinese Burmese who moved back to China in the Fifties when Chairman Mao’s dream still appeared unsullied. But during the lunacy of the Cultural Revolution, their university degrees counted against them: a young Zhang and her mother were separated from her father and brother and forced – as part of the country’s “re-education” programme – to swap their urban lifestyle for the grinding poverty of the Chinese countryside.

When she was 9, Zhang was able to return to Beijing with her mother, but the city offered scant relief from debilitating poverty. The two were briefly homeless, obliged to sleep on the desks of the small office where Zhang’s mother worked translating the grandstanding speeches of Communist leaders. Life did not improve much. A few years later, with China’s great economic boom still years away, the pair escaped to Hong Kong. Aged 14, Zhang toiled in the territory’s cramped, punishing garment factories. Driven by the need for hard cash, she would switch employers for the sake of a single dollar’s increase in pay.

“The motivation for working in the factories was to get out of the factories,” she says. The girls alongside her appeared content with their lives. She could never contemplate that. Convinced even then that education had the power to change everything, Zhang would scurry from each 12-hour shift straight to evening classes. She dreamt all the time, she says, simply of keeping pace with the education that “normal” teenage schoolgirls would be receiving back in China.

Slowly, her savings grew to the point where she could afford a plane ticket from Hong Kong to London. Armed with nothing but a raw immigrant’s ambition, she arrived in the UK and began another lowest-rung scrabble for cash. This time, there were English classes at the end of each work day. The strategy paid off: using grants and scholarships, she secured a place at the University of Sussex. Afterwards, she completed a master’s degree in development economics at Cambridge.

Earlier this year, Zhang returned to Sussex as an honorary Doctor of Laws and delivered a speech to graduating students. “It is the place that cultivated me, inspired me and encouraged me to follow my deepest instincts and to become the person that I am today,” she told them. “For this I am truly grateful.”

“If I look back at my life and ask myself what was the most important transformational element, I would say education,” she says. “The point it all changed was when I decided to go to England to become a student.

“When I first got there, I thought there has to be a model answer for these essays we write every week, because that is how the Chinese write. I would submit the essay and my tutor would call us in, and he wasn’t interested at all in whether this answer was right or wrong. Only later, I understood this is a way of cultivating your intellectual curiosity… That is still largely missing in Chinese education.”

via Zhang Xin: the billionaire queen of China’s new skyline | The Times.

26/05/2013

* Chinese dream is dream of whole humanity: Nepal’s former PM

English: Mr. Baburam bhattarai the 35th Prime ...

English: Mr. Baburam bhattarai the 35th Prime Minister of Nepal. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Xinhua: “Nepal‘s former Prime Minister and Vice-Chairman of Unified Communist party of Nepal (Maoist) Baburam Bhattarai said that Chinese dream is a dream of whole humanity as well as of Nepalese people.

 

The former prime minister, who is known as a Communist ideologue in his party, said in a recent exclusive interview with Xinhua, that Chinese dream is a dream of oppressed humanity of the world who has been dominated by foreign power for more than 200 years.

Referring to the significance of Chinese dream, Bhattarai said China has to play a leading role to bring peace, stability and development in the world.

In the interview, he said focus of development is now shifting to east and south Asia and China is going to lead that process through its new dream.

Comparing Chinese dream with American dream, the 59-year-old Maoist leader, said the earlier so-called western dream was the domination of world in the colonial form or neocolonialism form.

“But Chinese dream is ending of that domination and granting freedom to all people of the world and ensuring peace, prosperity and democracy to all. So Chinese dream is fundamentally different from the older day’s dream of the western world,” he opined.

The former Prime Minister Bhattarai who is known as architect of social and economic development said Chinese dream will contribute towards economic prosperity of Nepal and will ensure national independence and sovereignty as well.

Asked about Nepal’s dream, the Maoist leader who is second in command in his party, and also the key strategist during the ten- year-long people’s war, said after gaining political stability our dream of building a prosperous and develop Nepal will be realized.

“If there is political stability here and if there is correct political leadership, and if there is well balanced relations with our neighboring countries China and India, then we can develop and we can realize our dream,” said Bhattarai.

He said that after promulgation of a new constitution, Nepal will invite economic investment from both China and India and then will try to have some joint projects with both India and China.

“In that way gradually this dream of trilateral cooperation and Nepal emerging as a vibrant bridge between India and china will be realized,” he said.

Asked about the India’s unwillingness to strike a trilateral cooperation between Nepal, India and China, who gained his higher education from India said a section of people everywhere gets skeptical.

“I believe even in India, this opinion is slowly gaining momentum and soon there will be massive moments to have good relation between India and China and have a trilateral relation between Nepal. It will take some time but ultimately it will be realized, Bhattarai said.”

via Chinese dream is dream of whole humanity: Nepal’s former PM – Xinhua | English.news.cn.

See also: 

26/05/2013

* Could We Have an Indian Dream?

WSJ: “Everyone has heard of the American Dream. It promises equal opportunities and the chance for everyone to prosper through hard work. It is meant to be inclusive, and Indians are certainly among various groups to have shared in it.

It now seems there is a Chinese Dream, too. Xi Jinping has already mentioned the term several times in speeches since he became president in March. Smaller nations like Qatar and New Zealand have also recently stated their national dreams, and now even Vanuatu is striving for one.

Surely India – a vast, populous country and possible powerhouse of the 21st Century – needs its own dream. It’s not just a matter of being left out. Collective dreams are necessary to hold a people together, to inspire, to get everyone pushing in the same direction.

India had a national dream before 1947. That dream was to become an independent country, and it came true. But things have become a bit fuzzy since then. Today, if you asked someone on the street what India’s national dream is, they wouldn’t know. If you asked a politician, he may talk about it for an hour, but in the end neither he nor you would know.

The word “dream” captures the imagination, but frankly what we’re talking about is a vision that is grounded in reality, something actionable.”

via Could We Have an Indian Dream? – India Real Time – WSJ.

See also: https://chindia-alert.org/2013/05/03/xi-jinpings-vision-chasing-the-chinese-dream/

Law of Unintended Consequences

continuously updated blog about China & India

ChiaHou's Book Reviews

continuously updated blog about China & India

What's wrong with the world; and its economy

continuously updated blog about China & India